Russia and Ukraine flashpoint

[Ryuu96]

crissindahouse said:

Would really like to get a statement from guys like Biden, Scholz and so on how they think Ukraine can win if they aren't allowed to destroy Russia's most valuable equipment.

I mean, if you say you are against using missiles against targets in Russia and you also say you want Ukraine to win this war you have to have an explanation how this can work, right? Because otherwise Russia will just shoot rockets on Ukraine for the next 100 years. Russia may not take a lot of new territory but why should they ever stop shooting at Ukraine from Russian ground if they have to fear exactly 0.

There is no logical military stance for this so there is no explanation.

Even IF Russia gets pushed back beyond the border, they'll just spend the next 50 years lobbing missiles at Ukraine, thus ensuring that Ukraine is never accepted into NATO because there's still an active conflict.

It's also more cost effective to use a missile on the jets that fire the missiles rather than the missiles themselves but doesn't seem nobody cares about that either, it is way more expensive to only be shooting down the missiles.

Wars cannot be won through defence only, the best defence is a good offence, kill the archer than the arrow.

Biden/Scholz/Macron/Keir don't understand basic military knowledge or don't care.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 12 July 2024