Currently Online 
| Ryuu96 said: This is what the PM of the National Rally said in June: "I wish for Ukraine to have at disposal the ammunition and equipment it needs to hold the front, but my red line will not change, which is sending equipment that could have consequences of escalation in eastern Europe," Bardella told reporters at the Eurosatory arms fair near Paris. "And so I don't plan to send, especially, long-range missiles or other weapons that will allow Ukraine to strike the Russian territory. My position has not changed and will not change – it's about support for Ukraine and avoiding all risks of escalation in the region. And I think the risk of escalation is of course real." ==== Reads like defensive only equipment, you could read it that they won't send long-range missiles at all (even if Ukraine promises not to use them on Russian soil) and the line "equipment it needs to hold the front" so essentially he doesn't want Ukraine retaking their territory, only holding the current lines, aka keep what you've taken Russia. So many western Europe countries "concerned" about escalation in eastern Europe meanwhile eastern Europe countries are sending practically everything they have, telling the western Europe countries to do more, telling them to lift all stupid red-line restrictions and yet western Europe politicians are "concerned" despite the fact that if a war did break out it would be the eastern European countries who would suffer the most. The "concern" is just cowardice or wanting to help Russia. Grow some fucking balls like eastern Europe has. |
Hopefully things will be easier in 2025, so that these restrictions on aid that we are expecting from France and the US won't affect Ukraine too much.
