By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BengaBenga said:
MikeB said:
NJ5 said:
MikeB said:
NJ5 said:
MikeB said:

The 360 took nothing from the PS3.

Wait, did you just.... no... really? no...

 

Name some games instead of resorting to childishness measures.

Sorry, I tend to be "childish" when I see such outrageous denial.

One word (or actually an acronym) - JRPGs, enough said (not that there aren't other examples).

 

Like?

Blue Dragon was funded by Microsoft themselves. Final Fantasy XIII (Square Enix) and Sony funded White Knight Story (Level 5) are coming to the PS3.

In any case the 360 does not peform well enough at all in Japan for Sony to worry about the 360 for Japanese content.

That's not the point. If Eternal Sonata, Blue Dragon, Lost Odyssee would have been on PS3, the console would have done way better in Japan.
360 isn't performing well in Japan, but it is taking away the games that are important for the PS3.

 

Lost Odessey was a failed Microsoft funded project. Eternal Sonata is coming to the PS3 in September.

Claiming Lost Odessey was taken from the PS3 is IMO like claiming Heavenly Sword was taken from the 360.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales