By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust on 24 May 2024
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
HoloDust said:

Yeah, massive props to them for making Switch port, though some things took quite a big hit (especially water). I still find Witcher 3 port to be better looking in many aspects than Hogwarts on Switch.

Hogwarts required harsher sacrifices as its a much more technically demanding game than Witcher 3.

Witcher manages 1080p on PS4 and 900p on Xbox One, while Hogwarts brings PS4 down to 900p and Xbox One kicking and screaming all the way down to 720p with framerate struggles to boot. Both also needed content changes just to work on those machines such as new walls to block off demanding views or tables remade in a more geometric design.

Witcher 3 on Switch is an exemplary port, one of the best of a demanding title on the system especially with the settings options added later, but Hogwarts must have been significantly harder to pull off, hence the deeper cuts.

All true - I'm just saying, from my POV, overall, Witcher 3 on Switch looks better than Hogwarts on Switch.
Mad props to them for bringing Hogwarts to Switch, but with a bit more financing and time, I think they could've made it even better looking than it currently is.
And now being Nintendo owned, they will probably get both more money and time for all the projects Nintendo deems important - like potential GTA VI or something of that rank.