By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 on 05 May 2024
Edit Thread

Who are they trying to kid?

"The first red line involves the possibility of a third party's direct or indirect involvement in north-western Ukraine, potentially creating a corridor between Ukraine and Belarus."

This is a lie considering it has already happened, Belarus already has an indirect involvement in Ukraine, they literally let Russia use their border to invade Ukraine, they let Russia use their country to attack Ukraine. If Russian troops were amongst Belarusian troops, is NATO seriously trying to make me believe they would get involved? Lol.

If this is really the case then why won't NATO just put peacekeeping troops on the Belarusian border already?

The second red line pertains to military provocations against Baltic States, Poland, or Moldova, which could test NATO's reaction during a period of possible confusion, such as election seasons in Europe and the United States. Though there are no immediate plans to send troops to Ukraine.

Another lie, considering drones have already crashed in those listed countries and Russian missiles have flown through Polish airspace.

Moldova

And...Another lie, why do they expect us to believe they would help Moldova, a country not in the EU or NATO (so in the exact same position as Ukraine) but not Ukraine? Also it's a lie because there are literally fucking Russian troops in Moldova right now illegally occupying the land of Transnistria.

Who is this even for? Russia will see this and laugh, pro-Ukraine people will see it and be infuriated by the bullshit, is it just for NATO to pat themselves on the back and say "see, we're tough, don't try what you've already done, Russia!"

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 05 May 2024