the-pi-guy said:
Probably vs no probably, seems to suggest you think you're more correct. Despite the facts not really supporting that. |
fair enough lol. Wasn’t my intention, but I can see how you could read that. I’m giving a concession: There’s probably more to it than NATO provocation, just as there is probably more to it than USSR glory.
as far as responding to everything else, I’ll need a minute. Just thought I’d comment on this bc I thought it was a little funny.
(p.s. using the Lord’s name in vain is a big no-no. personally, I won’t be bothered if you do continue to use it, though I will make my request heard.)
(p.s.s. Call what I’m saying Russian propaganda, and I’ll just resort to calling all your guys line to state department propaganda. Let’s be careful not letting our entire arguments rely on mudslinging and shoot-downs. im not holier than thou, but it is a waste when debates take that route.)