Bofferbrauer2 said:
The big unknown with RDNA4 is the memory. Will that 8800XT come with a 256 bit bus and 16GB VRAM or will there be more? Considering that the purported performance will be roughly on par with the 7900XT, which comes with 20GB, a 320 bit bus seems more appropriate - but at the same time too big for a non-high-end card. My RDNA4 expectations:
|
I agree with most of your post. I only disagree with the performance of the 8600, because a 6800 isn't much slower than the current 7800, and if the 8700 has that level of performance, that could lead to problems with those two cards.
At the same time, I really hope the 8600 gets the performance bump it didn't have this gen, so I have mixed feelings.
EricHiggin said: Last time AMD Radeon only bothered with mid tier cards was the 400/500 Polaris series, which is also the same timeframe that PS4 Pro launched. |
The last time AMD only had mid tier cards was with the first RDNA cards in the form of the RX 5000 series, topping out with the 5700 XT, which was a farily competitive card, tying with the 2070 in raster (the first gen RDNA cards didn't have ray tracing hardware in them).
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.