| Renamed said: You don't seem to understand the difference between precisely following a mandate for social safety and the foundational science used to craft the mandate. Failure to precisely follow the details of the mandate are not a valid claim that the party does not believe the science itself. Nor does it refute your original claim: "COVID-19 is a hoax". You use nothing but fallacies as evidence rather than actual evidence. You also don't seem to grasp both irony and Occam's Razor. |
Yet where is the evidence you claim proves there was a pandemic. You don't seem to grasp irony do you?
"You don't seem to understand the difference between precisely following a mandate for social safety and the foundational science used to craft the mandate. "
You seem to be creating a series of safety barriers so you don't have to explain what you see through observation. The question is why would those who 'crafted' a mandate for 'social safety' didn't follow that mandate themselves.
"Failure to precisely follow the details of the mandate are not a valid claim that the party does not believe the science itself"
According to whom? Your now stating your opinion as fact. If its not a valid claim then what is it? A serendipitious coincidence of circumstances?
Honestly, please have a look at Occam's Razor because that will help you look past your own nonsense.
