| Renamed said: 1. Your article is about politicians. At what point did I mention politicians. Your link also didn't involve the scientists that actually sat behind the microscope. That's an example of an indirect exemplar and the association fallacy to support your case. Nor does the existence of a group exceeding the capacity mandate serve as a valid premise that the pandemic was a hoax, Covid-19 wasn't real or didn't post a global health threat. 2. Irony. I hope you can Google that one. |
Well actually there is Professor Neil Fergurson who developed the UK Governments pandemic response yet was caught breaking the lockdown rules. A scientist who developed those rules didn't follow them himself. In fact while we are here, where is your proof there was a pandemic?
"That's an example of an indirect exemplar and the association fallacy to support your case"
It's an example of politicans who told you to 'trust the science' but didn't trust the science themselves. Yet you won't explain why the politicans didn't trust their fake science. You only avoid the point to escape your own fallacy.
I trust you can Google the word irony, since you don't seem to understand what that means either.
One more thing:
Occam's Razor. It applies here but your denial of observation prevents you from seeing the truth, hence why you won't answer the question.
