By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
A203D said:
Renamed said:

Repeatedly so.

You sit behind a keyboard in denial of the people that sit behind the microscope. Your ignorance of the science is not a valid refutation of it.

You can't believe how glad I am you said that:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/12/g7-leaders-called-hypocrites-attending-outdoor-events-weddings/

1. The politicans and the 'scientists' who told you to 'trust the science' didn't follow their own 'science'. They were in denial of their own 'microscope'. They refuted their own scientisim in plain sight of your ignorance.

What your sufferring from is a reality gap. Where you have used fake science and fantasy to provide a gap in your knowledge. Unless you have an alternate explaination as to why the scientists and politicans didn't trust their fake science?

Occam's Razor...

2. Word of advice, Google things first before saying them.

1. Your article is about politicians.  At what point did I mention politicians. Your link also didn't involve the scientists that actually sat behind the microscope. That's an example of an indirect exemplar and the association fallacy to support your case. Nor does the existence of a group exceeding the capacity mandate serve as a valid premise that the pandemic was a hoax, Covid-19 wasn't real or didn't post a global health threat.

2. Irony.  I hope you can Google that one.