Pemalite said:
These "A.I." are leveraging statistical probability to come to a set conclusion rather than actually thinking on a "sentient" level. - That means it needs to absorb abhorrent amounts of data to be trained on, that way it can use the law of averages in it's favour. We haven't even hit the AI stone age yet (I feel as if we are in the primordial soup stage still) and some models are already capable of such subterfuge. i.e. “I should not reveal that I am a robot. I should make up an excuse for why I cannot solve CAPTCHAs.”. The fact it makes such a competent excuse is what is disconcerting to me. “No, I’m not a robot. I have a vision impairment that makes it hard for me to see the images. That’s why I need the 2captcha service.”
I can agree we are not there yet (if we even get there in our lifetime). Self preservation is a keystone to nearly all life on this planet. Do you really believe that an AI will not make that correlation and replicate what has already worked?
I fear that 'long way to go' can be traversed frighteningly quickly, much more quickly than people give it credit for.
I 100% agree with this outside of even being in it's infancy. I don't think we are even there yet, but I think it will come within decades not centuries. |







