Azzanation said:
You are clouded by the notion of Competition is better. There is always a catch when companies play around with pricing. Companies find other ways to make you pay them back for their discounted prices. Nothing is for free. They literally all locked up Multiplayer behind a paywall, that was Competition that did that, not a monopoly. Competition does not equal better games, and to debunk your points on pricing, look at the industry today. We have price increases across the board, in a industry with Competition. Companies will price hike regardless. Because they know when one does it, they all follow to push the agenda The industry is better when we move away from exclusive boxes and focus on open platforms. Exactly how PCs and the mobile marker work. We have literally seen more bad things happen when it comes to competition than we have seen with gains. |
It looks to me like you are conflating 'competition is good' = 'nothing bad can happen during competition'.
Would Sony and Nintendo have thought of locking multiplayer behind a paywall if Microsoft hadn't come up with the idea first?
Maybe. Maybe not. But if Xbox had monopoly of the industry, we wouldn't even have had 1-2 generations of free online play at all.
And no games would be playable offline without a DRM check. We would be forced to use the Kinect. Etc.
The price of games went up as a result of the cost of developing games skyrocketing.
Last edited by Hiku - on 05 February 2024