By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shikamaru317 said:
Ryuu96 said:

There's A LOT of very angry Pokemon fans, Lol.

I'm pretty sure if The Pokemon Company had a case, they would sue them already, but we shall see, a lot of the designs are suspicious but I don't think they'd be grounds for a lawsuit, I'd love a lawyer to comment on this, but I feel like a court would just rule it in the grounds of inspiration or protected under parody rather than straight up copyright violation, Lol.

There's clearly a lot of Pokemon "influence" but they also appear changed enough to avoid any legal complications.

The comments about animal cruelty are dumb.

What Nintendo and Pokemon Company should do is see it as a wake-up call. There is alot of wasted potential within the Pokemon franchise, nearly every Pokemon game they release is overly safe and paint by the numbers, and they still treat the series as if though it is a handheld series even though Switch is both handheld and home console. They could deliver a AAA pokemon game that blows both Palworld and their own earlier games away, with a huge open world, crafting, voice acting, higher end graphics, detailed pokemon attack animations, and more, but instead they keep playing it safe and making lower budget handheld game offerings even though Pokemon's strong sales more than justify a much higher budget going back into development. 

That last line is why they won't, Lmao.

Game sells tens of millions without them having to change anything or improve on anything.