archbrix said:
I think we can all agree that the Switch is the correct answer here. But the PS3 no longer selling at a loss (which took until 2010) and Sony making money on its PS3 endeavor overall are two very different things. At the end of the day, Sony ended very much in the red for the PS3 era. And Blu-ray winning out over HD-DVD had way more to do with production companies than it did the PS3 and would have won with or without Sony's console featuring the media. The only big movie production company that was exclusively backing HD-DVD was Universal until Paramount, stupidly, decided to do the same at the last minute. This prompted the last big hold out, Warner Bros, to go exclusive with Blu-ray, which sealed the deal. Once that happened, Paramount made note of a specific contractual clause in its exclusive support of HD-DVD that stated that the deal was only for 6 months if Warner, again, the last big hold out, chose to side with Blu-ray, which it did. |
PS3 did make profit its last few years did it not? Never did I say it fully recovered but PS3 did make a comeback. Just look at the hardware and software sales in the 2nd half of its cycle. PS3 helped Blu Ray victory over HD DVD and you can't deny that. Whether it would've won without Sony including it in the PS3; we don't know for sure but it's definitely did help and end the format war early







