By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Squilliam said:
TheRealMafoo said:
starcraft said:

There is a reason I'm making this thread, but we'll save that for after it's gotten a few responses.

Which console do you personally believe has the most diverse line-up/library of quality titles? I do not mean the BEST line-up/library of quality titles, I mean the most diverse. 

Edit:  Out of current generation machines.

 

Ok, now that you have a few responces, and your answer (BC PS3 will play something like 12,000 games), what is the reason you are making this thread?

P.S. Just in case you wanted to look it up:
http://www.sonyindex.com/

 

GEAT REAL DUDE!

That level of choice just leads to a massive case of cognitive dissonance that paralyzes the victim. If anyone were to try to pick just 10 games from that list they'd go mad just from the sheer quantity of choice.

For the sake of everyone, we must leave the PS2 out of it!

Actually, a good reason to is because most people here actually own a PS2 so the games are already accounted already.

 

 

Why would you want to remove a capability of a console when comparing it's capabilities?

I am sure the reason SC posted this thread, is to say if you want to buy a console for nothing other then games, you are an idiot for buying the PS3. I am just demonstrating why a consumer with a PS3, who plays nothing but games, is not one :)

Oh, and I sold my PS2 for an X-Box early in it's life, so I missed the second half of the PS2 library. It was one of the things I bought the PS3 for. That and it plays PS2 games better then the PS2 (upscaling), so even if you had played PS2 games, you might want to play them again :)