By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Squilliam said:
DTG said:
i love xbox360 said:
Gazz said:
Good luck trying to beat MGS4 then. Raising the bar high as far as game/cimematics go I see. looking at halo 3 they have a long way to go with getting graphics even close to as good as they are in MGS4 so good luck developing this game for 3 years or more if they can find staff as experienced as the ones that worked on MGS.

Anyway, a little ambition is a good thing so thumbs up.

 

halo already beat mgs4 look at the sales

 

That's like saying that the Harry Potter books have beat Shakespeare because they've sold more. They are completely different games, one is for mass entertainment and the other is more high concept and aren't to be compared in terms of sales just like you wouldn't compare the works of JK Rowling to that of Shakespeare.


 

MGSIV = Shakespear??!!? Its more like a typical pretensious Rialto movie.

 

MGS is more inbetween. It's like Shakespeare mixed with Harry Potter. A thinking mans story presented in the disguise of mass entertainment presentation.

Pretentious is usually a complement because people tend to call anything pretentious that challanges their frail ego and intellect. Just because the creator is smarter than you and actually tries to teach you something doesn't make them "pretentious".