By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller said:
DonFerrari said:

I didn't say a specific game played better, I said it was recognized to be better for some genres (like arcade shmups). Most of the titles on both consoles were either totally exclusive or made independently when the same game/IP so you would never have a real side/by side comparison.

for some of the few advantages MD had over SNES https://segaretro.org/Sega_Mega_Drive/Hardware_comparison

Not much in terms of advantages regarding hardware.  If the point is the genesis had some great games, especially focused in certain genres, I mean well yeah.

Yep, even on the portions MD had some advantages they weren't really big or noteworthy, reason why when talking about general performance SNES would be considered the better HW (and as we both agree when talking platform it would depend on platform, and sales were so close for most of their lifes that it shows a technical tie), but MD had those small advantages that helped some types of game (and sure a lot of disadvantages in other areas that impacted other types of games).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."