the-pi-guy said: "Sony has one of the most impressive content catalogues on Earth," Severin explains. "Bringing it together in a subscription offering for example could pose a solid competitive answer to Xbox's cross-platform efforts. It will be increasingly difficult to compete with Microsoft on games only. The only response for Sony on the games-only side would be buying something really big like Take-Two, but that is unlikely." Not sure if this is worth talking about. But at least some analysts think that Sony will/should make some kind of big meaningful acquisition. |
I'm pretty much against big purchases. I rather they open some extra teams on the studios they have and absorve the plenty of laid-off devs that occured this year and perhaps make studios (or finance like they did with Kojima) for the likes of Shinji Mikami (with possibility of acquiring like Haven).
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."