Spike0503 said:
I appreciate Fallout 2 but I don't consider it better than the original. In fact, I consider it a much more diluted experience. It's a bigger, more ambitious game for sure but the story doesn't pack a punch like the first game does (and it has several issues which I won't go into to avoid ranting lol). Plus, the amount of stuff they re-used from the original game, particularly the whole OST to the point of using a non-important track from the first game as the track for the final area of the game. For someone like me who really likes gaming OSTs, that was just unforgivable! Spoiler! not letting you save yourself with your mutant companion UNLESS you have the stupid DLC.
|
I replay them about equally, still think FO1 has better story, but FO2 is generally more open to how you do things (plus all the obvious gameplay fixes). I wouldn't mind Bethesda's Fallouts if they were reskinned and called something else, but I honestly don't find them to be good Fallout games. Now that both inXile and Obsidian are under MS, I do hope we'll get to see another Fallout that is more akin to originals - especially after all the media raving about BG3, maybe they will use momentum and convince higher-ups that there is market for old school isometric Fallout CRPG.
Yeah, I had luck with younger son, he likes to talk with me about games, about whats and hows, and likes to try them out for himself. He really loved FO1/2, but, for example, he couldn't get into Gothic 1/2, another favourites of mine that I tend to praise so much as well. Lately he's been talking about wanting to play TES II: Daggerfall - he didn't liked Skyrim, found Morrowind's scenery "too weird", so maybe he'll hit it off with the old classic. I'm more of a Might & Magic fan, but good for him.