Soundwave said:
A Steam Deck runs basically every game on an XBox Series X ... so that's a what then? These categories that people are obsessed with are silly. The Switch itself is not that far off from a XBox One, a full generation leap beyond that is what? It's not a PS4. DLSS isn't doing anything "by magic". Dramatically reducing the number of pixels to render a frame is like saying "bench pressing 350 or 200 pounds is the same" ... uh on what planet would that be true exactly? It's a huge difference. Switch 2 if it's a full generation leap over the current Switch, which it sounds like it is and maybe even then some with DLSS added on top of it is no fucking PS4. A regular Switch can run several PS4 games as is, if you doubled a Switch (a hypothetical Switch Pro that never came to be) it would run virtually every PS4 game. If you go a full generation above a Switch and give it DLSS on top of that ... I mean c'mon. That's total bullshit to keep saying "PS4 this, PS4 that". That's a system that's going to start blur generation lines totally, the Switch was already beginning to do it a little. If Nintendo is showing this Matrix Awakens demo too, it must probably run at a decent performance how ever they are doing it (rendering up from 540p pixels native?) because you're not going to have a tech demo that doesn't run reasonably well. |
If by run you mean with a ton of *** then yes, it does "run." Steam Deck has issues against PS4 let alone Xbox Series X:
"The Switch itself is not that far off from a XBox One, a full generation leap beyond that is what? "
Lol you serious?
What you need to understand is there is a difference between "running a game" and "running a game with high visual fidelity." Yea a Switch and PS4 can run the Witcher 3 but that doesn't mean they are anywhere near the same visual fidelity. And sure it ran the Matrix demo but at what settings? What were the sacrifices? Etc.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850