Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

hinch said:

JEMC said:

Well, the Steam Deck also has a 7" screen with a 800p resolution and few people complained about it, so I'd say that there's still a market for this size and resolution.

Besides, we're talking about Nintendo. They don't make a lot of money from their hardware, most of it comes from their software, and if they can save a few pennies here and there, you can bet that they'll do it.

Yeah I know its a perfectly servicable resolution for the size. Its just I'm wishing for progress from the origional NS lol. We'll see either way but yeah you're probably right 720P is the more sensible option considering its size, form factor and its cost savings and revenue to Nintendo.

If there's something I've learned from modern Nintendo (from the Wii until now), is that you need to keep expectations in check, and usually low. This is no longer the SNES, N64 or GameCube Nintendo that tried to make systems as powerful as possible. That time passed. Now it's about making hardware that's good enough for what they want to do with it and that it's easy to make a profit from.

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

AMD exclusive sponsorship apparently means every other vendor gets gimped. Not only does a 6800XT perform 40% faster than 3080 and A770 is performing worse than 5700 (non XT), but if you have Intel CPUs with Hyper Threading and E-cores enabled, you get worse performance than if you disable them where is if you have AMD CPUs with Hyper Threading enabled, it scales just fine. DLSS mod vs FSR is as usual, worlds better with DLSS.

AMD has truly become a cancer of PC gaming and they have gone down to EGS levels of scummyness where both of them are lacking in innovation and features vs their competitors but they can pay developers and force your experience to be subpar.

PC is still the best way to play though if you have modern hardware and I'd take Starfields largely stutter free experience (other than traversal) over Jedis stutter fest. Especially if you enable DLSS via mod.

*table*

I understand you anger, but I think you're directing it to the wrong place.

There are lots of new games that even today perform worse with E-cores enabled, and AMD has nothing to do with it. There are also games out there that perform worse with HT on, and Bethesda's engine is far from being new. And yes, I know that HT does work on AMD processors, it's true, but have to stopped to think that the Xbox consoles have AMD CPUs and, therefore, it makes sense that Bethesda has spend more time optimizing their code to take better advantage of that, and that work has translated to the PC version of the game?

After all, if AMD had gone that far to make the Intel CPUs look worse, why are the 13900K, 13700K and even 13600K processors the ones that run the game better than even AMD's premium X3D ones? It doesn't make sense.

And calling AMD a cancer to PC gaming... well, I don't really know how to respond to that.