UnderwaterFunktown said:
Well I do think it's a bit weird that BG3 is being singled out for being a finished product on release, I wouldn't really consider it a rarity, sure you can list many examples of games that were in a bad state at launch, but there are also tons that were perfectly fine. I guess the scope makes it more impressive to be fair, but I certainly wouldn't say unfinished games have become standard even if there's more of them than there should be for sure. And I don't really agree with "90s games didn't need any patches", it's true in some cases, but like I said in others you just had to live with it. I've encountered plenty of cases of unfinished content or bugs and if you look it up on the game's wiki it's just sort of like "oh yea that's just a thing". I do think some modern games have a more lax idea of what a game should look like on release than what was common in the 90s, but far from all of them and I would also say some probably put more effort into polishing the game up than what was standard back then. |
There are so many games that are released today that are simply unplayable on release.
That wasn't a common thing in the 90s.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--