By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Spade said:
Ryuu96 said:

Okay, this made me laugh.

I'm guessing they're getting quite some backlash to their Starfield review 😬

Honestly from what I've seen, things are largely tame, the Xbox fans aren't dooming, I'm avoiding Twitter trolls as per usual. 88 is a brilliant score and it's hard to troll it apart from "It won't win GOTY!" Lol. Xbox fans dooming was my biggest worry honestly, Lmao. But thankfully it's relatively chill. Aside from IGN being blasted it seems - IGN But We Take All The IGN Reviews : r/Starfield

*87, we not using Open. Meta for the MEN.  

OpenCritic has more reviews, adds them quicker, it is therefore more accurate, it has no weighted nonsense like Meta does, it also combines Console + PC as at the end of the day it is the same game, so ultimately once again, more accurate to how the overall game is. The only negative is combining reviews doesn't help someone who plays on a specific platform.

Meta is for boomer fucks, its fanbase is old and the site is old.