By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
numberwang on 13 August 2023
Edit Thread
Pemalite said:
numberwang said:

RDOA3 is just 1% faster compared to RDNA2 with identical clock and VRAM speeds. There is strong variation game to game, example RDR2 is 20% faster but Horizon ZD is 10-30% slower.

Overall RDNA3 is 3-10% faster irl compared to RNDA2 depending on games and resolution but all of it comes from higher clocks and power consumption. The 7600 is very similar to the 6650XT (which is an overclocked 6600).

The 6650XT is not just an overclocked 6600, it's an overclocked 6600XT. - Different chips.

The 6600 actually has less CU's, 56GB/s less banwidth... But also a 50w lower TDP than the 6600XT.

The 7600 is actually a great replacement/upgrade over the vanilla 6600, but we also need to compare them based on price... Where the 6650XT is actually cheaper than the 7600, making the 7600 a bad buy.
And if we compare it against the 6600, the 6600 is $100 AUD (25%) cheaper, so if you are on a really tight budget, might be the better choice anyway.

The video is addressing the naming issues. The 7600 has the same number of CUs as the 6600XT (4 more than the 6600) so 7600 vs. 6600XT is the direct comparison for RDNA3 vs 2 architecture.