By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
numberwang said:

RDOA3 is just 1% faster compared to RDNA2 with identical clock and VRAM speeds. There is strong variation game to game, example RDR2 is 20% faster but Horizon ZD is 10-30% slower.

Overall RDNA3 is 3-10% faster irl compared to RNDA2 depending on games and resolution but all of it comes from higher clocks and power consumption. The 7600 is very similar to the 6650XT (which is an overclocked 6600).

The 6650XT is not just an overclocked 6600, it's an overclocked 6600XT. - Different chips.

The 6600 actually has less CU's, 56GB/s less banwidth... But also a 50w lower TDP than the 6600XT.

The 7600 is actually a great replacement/upgrade over the vanilla 6600, but we also need to compare them based on price... Where the 6650XT is actually cheaper than the 7600, making the 7600 a bad buy.
And if we compare it against the 6600, the 6600 is $100 AUD (25%) cheaper, so if you are on a really tight budget, might be the better choice anyway.

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

Not what I'd call a good gen on gen uplifts or good pricing either as you can get a 7900XT for $700-$750 vs $650 which is a big leap in performance if you want to go AMD.

Honestly the 7900GRE is a great card, it's just priced and named incorrectly.

It would be a fitting 7700XT or something with 6800XT levels of performance.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--