Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

JEMC said:

Nintendo always tries to cut corners somwhere. We can be certain the it will use an LCD screen, but that won't be all so, what do you prefer, skimp on DLSS or skimp on internal storage again.

Well if they go with MicroSD expansion, then they can skimp out on storage if they want to cause 1TB Microsd is very cheap. Hell they could even have a base model and a "pro" model with more storage like the wiiU days.

A better case would be more like, would you rather have them skimp out on DLSS or skimp out on Ram like they almost did with the original Switch until capcom forced them to go 4GB instead of 2GB. I do think the Switch 2 should have a minimum of 12GB to 16GB since that should be very cheap these days considering the Steam Deck has 16GB and the Switch 2 will likely see a price bump to $400. So between those two, I'd prefer more ram due to compatibility. But I'd rather have them get rid of motion controls and add in dlss. But that might kill backwards compatibility.

I really doubt Nintendo will get rid of motion controls, and not for backwards compatibility. Nintendo proved that they're more than open to skimp on that with the Switch Lite, but it has become part of its trademark systems for the last almost 20 years, and they always find ways to use it for something.

Besides that, Nintendo won't skimp on DLSS unless they and Nvidia go for a SoC that, somehow, uses a GPU architecture that predates Turing, which seems highly unlikely. Even if Nintendo doesn't include that in their software kits, devs can and will find ways to implement it.

With the amount of RAM, tho, now that's more troublesome. It wouldn't really surprise me if they go with 8GB, like a mid to low range card.