| hinch said: I do think they could've gotten much more performance for the base 4060Ti by giving it 12GB and a 192 bit bus. And that would've been a way more enticing GPU for the mainstream. Especially if Nvidia wants to charge $400+ for it. Rn though its like you said its a 4050, and even less savvy people can probably guess even without watching/reading any reviews that its going to be meh graphics card for the price, and generally a bad 60 tier product. Where this used to be the best bang for buck and nearly always match the previous generation's 80 class cards prior. |
They could have even taken it in the opposite direction and went with 22400MT/s VRAM on a 96-bit bus in a clamshell design.
Would have provided 270GB/s of bandwidth... That would have made a good 4050 Ti with 12GB of VRAM.
Then jump up to 192bit with the 4060 Ti for 537GB/s with 12GB.
nVidia is betting on DLSS and frame generation to set the 4060 series from the 3060 series, which is fair, people have shown they have a desire for nVidia's propriety technologies.
AMD Needed to do the same with the 7600 as well. It's not a viable upgrade for 6600XT or 6650XT users, in-fact many benchmarks it turns out to be notably slower.
The 8GB of Ram is bullshit on that chip too. - It should have been called the 7500XT.
The best GPU's to buy right now from a price/performance/vram perspective is the 12GB Radeon 6700XT/6750XT. - But stock of those are running out.
We need the market to start correcting itself... It's not the era of COVID or Crypto, so something has to give sooner rather than later.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
