Ryuu96 said:
The Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice said Wednesday that their new focus when evaluating mergers will include the impact a deal will have on competition for workers along with how a series of acquisitions, rather than one-offs, could result in harmful effects on the market.
The new guidelines, currently in draft form, encapsulate the agencies' push to keep pace with the digital age and a changing market. The proposed rules apply to both vertical and horizontal mergers. Almost two years ago, the FTC voted to withdraw the previous version of the vertical merger guidelines released in 2020, citing flaws.
In the new guidelines, they outlined 13 points they will use to evaluate whether a merger should be blocked:
1. Mergers should not significantly increase concentration in highly concentrated markets.
2. Mergers should not eliminate substantial competition between firms.
3. Mergers should not increase the risk of coordination.
4. Mergers should not eliminate a potential entrant in a concentrated market.
5. Mergers should not substantially lessen competition by creating a firm that controls products or services that its rivals may use to compete.
6. Vertical mergers should not create market structures that foreclose competition.
7. Mergers should not entrench or extend a dominant position.
8. Mergers should not further a trend toward concentration.
9. When a merger is part of a series of multiple acquisitions, the agencies may examine the whole series.
10. When a merger involves a multi-sided platform, the agencies examine competition between platforms, on a platform, or to displace a platform.
11. When a merger involves competing buyers, the agencies examine whether it may substantially lessen competition for workers or other sellers.
12. When an acquisition involves partial ownership or minority interests, the agencies examine its impact on competition.
13. Mergers should not otherwise substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.
FTC and DOJ lay out rules for merger review to reflect digital economy (cnbc.com)
|
This actually is something I thought about if MS continues to get big acquisitions. Could they eventually be considered a monopoly when it comes to employment in the relevant market. In this case, the gaming market.
If someone just came out of college to be a game developer, and Xbox owns a good chunk of major game companies that have tens of thousands of employees each, you're most likely going to end up working for Xbox by default.
I don't think it'll actually become an issue due to how huge other major publishers are and the likes of Tencent, but that is something that could draw additional scrutiny and make proceedings last even longer.
