| Ryuu96 said: I've read multiple times in the Era thread that they don't actually have to do a shareholder vote to extend the deal by a short time but I don't know if that is true, it is definitely what a lot are saying though. Maybe they have to do one if it's a drastic change of circumstances but not one if it's a minor change? Tbh in my mind, a shareholder vote for a 1-2 month delay sounds a bit unnecessary. |
Yes, I believe it's in the way they could propose the extension, ABK can say they will still abide by the deal up to X after that they would do another vote to either formally extend the deal or leave it while preparing and extended version in the mean time to submit to a vote in case they do have to go to that extent.
This should be within Kottick's power because he also allows shareholders to voice displeasure by announcing their plans. This would not result in a material change to the deals though, only a set timeline to which they might or quit.
But I'm just speculating on the way I would find adequate if I was a shareholder. @Imaginedvl can tell if he finds this adequate 😉.
