Soundwave said:
Sounds like you're the one triggered, everyone knows DLSS is Nvidia proprietary tech that likely will be part of the next Switch. Also funny how you conveniently skip over DLSS 2.0+ which is fine and does everything I've said, it can take a 360p image and make it look like 720p or better, you don't need DLSS 3.0 for that. I'm guessing you knew that, which is why you chicken shitted out of mentioning DLSS 2.0+. |
I got a moderation warning, I was a bit mocking with the gifs, I admit it, and I apologise to everyone else for that. You, on the other hand, have always been aggressive when things don't go in the direction of the brand you idolise. Be more civil on the forum and I'll be more civil with you. Everyone will be happy.
So back to subject : believe it or not, I'm not too familiar with DLSS 2. I use DLSS 3 on games that allow it, it's really fantastic. I tested DLSS 1 on a game that only had that and it was horrible. I've never tested DLSS 2. So I did my research to find out more about DLSS 2. I have read that to have DLSS 2, you need a Geforce RTX 2060 (around €280 today) and an RTX 2080 TI (around €540 today)."
Do you think the Switch 2 can afford these prices ? I wouldn't hold my breath. So I'd bet more on DLSS 1. Then maybe I'm wrong and Nintendo will release a more expensive system than usual.
