the-pi-guy said: It was kind of wild how unprepared Jim Ryan seemed. |
It really feels like...I don't know if Jim Ryan helped FTC at all? Lol.
Spade said:
Disagree on Sarah Bond having having the best. She had an easy job with just explaining the market. She did a great job with doing that, but wasn't pressed. I'd give the biggest W to Phil tbh. The way he shut down the economist? with basic knowledge he would know, explaining how the Switch is competition, while also being pressed gives him the edge imo. Beth did too well especially that 3rd? day with the Harvard economist. Legit felt bad for him. Shoutout to Jim Ryan on his testimony as well. Didn't expect that level of entertainment. Wish he showed up live though. |
How bout you STFU? Who did the Judge praise? Sarah! Did she praise Phil? No!
Jk.
She did have an "easy" job but still explaining the market that eloquently on trial is still a tough job and she made an impression on the judge more than others so explaining the market might have helped Microsoft throughout the entire trial.
Actually I completely forgot about Phil shutting down FTC's lawyer, that was pretty brutal to have the person on trial giving you an economics education in front of dozens of people, Lol. Phil was sharp.
Bruh, FTC's expert witness was dragged throughout the entire trial...Even on the closing arguments he was still being dragged, and the judge kept pointing out how Microsoft's expert witness, Elizabeth, had data but FTC's didn't, Lol.
Elizabeth's pay rate should be swapped with Microsoft's other expert witness, that dude didn't feel worth the $1.2m, Lol.