Xbox |OT|

[Imaginedvl]

Machiavellian said:

Imaginedvl said:

lol as annoying as is he, the dude is a machine :)

Also, Jim is responding with VERY simple Yes/No and sometime elaborates a bit... But he has been trained very well haha

Hmm, I wonder how this work with cross examination for MS Lawyer.  I guess in this particular trial it does not matter but under cross examination pretty much a lot of these statements could be challenged.  I am not sure how you can challenge a video deposition at this trial.

Yes, I do not know if Microsoft lawyers listened (or attended) the FTC part and then simply asked questions to cross-examine him when it was their turn.

That's a good point, very interested to see how this will play :) Will know in few minutes haha