By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:
Imaginedvl said:

One thing they are mentioning and that is quite showing what Spade is saying about reviews and other stuff super biased when it comes to Xbox. Final Fantasy 16 (who by the looks amazing and the demo was super fun). Is at 30FPS too. The performance mode is bad; I switched back to 30FPS during the demo.

It does not make the game bad but you can see the cherry picking from the medias and gamers when it is the end of the world for Starfield but nobody even talk about it for a big game like Final Fantasy 16…

Interesting that you bring u FF16 demo.  While I was playing it I do say I like the action nature of it and it is a lot of fun probably the most fun I have had in a FF game.  Graphics wise, especially in game it did not wow me.  The lighting looks flat.  The character models are very high detailed but the environments are pretty static and because of this I expected the lighting to be way better.  You are right, no one is complaining about the FPS but then again always remember that MS needs to over perform because basically they took a year off, its the nature of the beast.

Yah :) I'm actually super hyped to play it next week. Don't want to spoil others but the story started on a very good note :D 
For the combat, well, I am a huge fan of turn-based or if not turn-based I prefer aimed-based combat than timing ones, but it def. looks super sharp.

And yah, Microsoft needs to prove themselves more than Sony, def. I think Starfield is def. going to deliver for that part!