By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Imaginedvl said:
Ryuu96 said:

Shocked! /s.

It has so much going on that I can't really blame them.

But I think they should have at least aimed for that 44? Whatever it is.

Having said that, noticeable framerate drops at 30fps would be pretty unacceptable, Lol.

Locked 30fps? I don't give a f*ck.

Oh I think that for what the game offers, the 30FPS is fine for sure :) Would have loved 60 still! 
looks like it is locked based on what he said so it should be good

If it's locked then fine by me.

Of course it's going to be blown way out of proportion for the console warz, without taking into consideration the sheer scale of this video game and everything going on with it on a technical level.

Meanwhile most Bethesda fans, of which a huge chunk are already on PC, won't give a shit, I reckon, Lol.

Would be better at 60fps for the FPS segments no doubt, but I don't think it'll be fast paced enough to notice it too much, plus there ARE things developers can do at 30fps to 'hide' it and make it 'feel' less like 30fps.

Forgot what those were mind, but I'm pretty sure it was DigitalFoundry who say 30fps can be largely masked using a certain technique.

And speaking of DigitalFoundry, even those guys months ago were saying they'd be very surprised if Starfield was 60fps on consoles, should always listen to them