DonFerrari said:
Nope, even for stuff I care about I rather the government doesn't touch it at all. Are we really going the route that UK isn't a democracy so MS should go to their government and demand intervention on CMA to reestablish democracy? Please tell me how the legal route on an independent body is external influence that detriments its independence. |
Nope, even for stuff I care about I rather the government doesn't touch it at all.
I believe we are simply not talking about the same thing here, as I don't know how this apply to my response
Are we really going the route that UK isn't a democracy so MS should go to their government and demand intervention on CMA to reestablish democracy?
That's not what I said, Uk is a democracy and a working democracy accept the fact that being challenged is a thing, that's the principle behind many right such as freedom of expression and access to justice.
Please tell me how the legal route on an independent body is external influence that detriments its independence.
independence <> unaccountability, the independent entity did not make itself up, it was created with a mandate, if they overreached or are suspected to have overreached on such mandate it is expected that they get challenged. Otherwise, you imply that such a body is perfect and cannot be faulted in any way.