If RROD had never existed, do you think 360 sales could've been far better?

[whatever]

montrealsoon said:

TheRealMafoo said:

montrealsoon said:
The average person has not even heard of RRoD. I think RRoD is a bigger issue for 'gaming proponents' on whatever side of the spectrum they side with.

I think the cluttered menu system of the 360 is a bigger potential handicap for new (and very unexperienced) users than RRoD.

 

How can you people think something failing 1 in 3... that's 1 in 3!!! is something people don't know about?

As for HD sales, the "HD consoles" collectively have more market then the Wii. if the 360 was not a pice of shit from a build quality perspective, it would have most all of that market.

          You say "people", I said "the average person".

          The average person probably hasn't heard of the 360, much less RRoD.

 

           >> if the 360 was not a pice of shit from a build quality perspective, it would have most all of that market.<<

           If you really think that, you are in serious denial of why people are buying up the Wii in hordes.

           RRoD is a problem with the gaming enthusiasts.   The 360 "design and games" represents the best of what 2004 had to offer.

 

 

 

 

This is completely untrue.  This got a lot of coverage in the US, on shows like Today and GMA.  I've had people that don't follow video games much at all tell me they wouldn't touch the 360 because it is unreliable.  They don't know the exact RROD details, but the fact that the 360 is unreliable it out in the general public.