Currently Online 
DonFerrari said:
You may talk about yourself. Myself I'm advocate to minimum government and intervention. And if the law/procedure in one country is independence then you shall keep and respect that instead of when it is for something you want them decide to have intervention. That is the type of breach that government love to use to increase its power. |
No, I was talking generally, do you often see someone meddle with things without interest? So a more clear answer to your prior post would be "Of course because this is how it works with literally every subject".
And if the law/procedure in one country is independence then you shall keep and respect that instead of when it is for something you want them decide to have intervention.
That's literally the opposite of how a democracy works though. Some countries' laws and practices allowed/still allow for pretty shady things and the only way forward is if/when people start questioning/disrespecting those shady laws and procedures in the first place.
Advocating for one way relationship with the government is counter-productive, if 1 government body's sole purpose is to meddle with companies then it is to be expected that companies can voice their concern, and grievances, and be heard by the government.
That is the type of breach that government love to use to increase its power.
What leads countries to increase power is unaccountability or the thought they could get away with X. There's no scenario where challenging the government using legal means is wrong or should be avoided for the sake of the government.
Last edited by EpicRandy - on 06 June 2023
