| Bofferbrauer2 said: I'm actually expecting the 4060 to be weaker than the 3060 without DLSS3 in a wide range of games. Just like the 4060Ti did compared to the 3060Ti, The 4060 looses 4 Streaming Multiprocessors compared to the 3060. However, while the 4060Ti could compensate most of the drop from 38 to 34 SM with clock speed and IPC improvements, this will be much harder for the 4060, who drops from 28 to 24SM, which is by percentage a much bigger loss. Worse, the clock speed increase over Ampere is smaller than with the 4060Ti, and the latter already got beaten by it's predecessor in several games... |
I saw some shots from the slide performance before, it was doing worse with the Witcher 3 Remaster, and that was with DLSS and frame generation...
Imagine not using either and the 4060 will just perform worse outright, and that's why I hate that these cards are having to rely on both those techs, just to make perf look semi decent.
It's just annoying to see them rely so heavily on both DLSS/Frame gen, when we know without it, the cards get worse off perf. It's like they are trying to sell a a triple beef burger, but by the time you get it, it only contains a single patty and looks nothing like what was advertised.
At this point, NVidia's low end seems like a "why did you guys bother with this?" moment. I just wish we could go back to having the 80ti,80,70,60, not:
90ti, 90, 80ti, 80, 70ti, 70, 60ti,60 and "Super" variants in between, it's so saturated and almost pointless.
Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see
So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"
