Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Bofferbrauer2 said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Well the problem is that the 7600 is being flanked by two GPUs that are realistically better buys. A 6700 gives you 10GB of vram and costs about the same and the upcoming 4060 which gives you DLSS 3 and significantly better efficiency. Now personally I'd be choosing the 6700 but the problem with 7600 is there is no real reason to choose it over the other two. It has the same shit vram as the 4060 but it sucks 4060 Ti levels of power while not having Nvidia goodies such as DLSS 3, Reflex, etc. And 6700 is not only faster but has more vram for almost the same money. So why would anyone choose it?

Honestly this should have been $200 and 4060 $230 or $250.

The big question with the 4060 will be how it performs. I'm fairly sure we'll get some benchmarks here too that have negative growth compared to the 3060 like the 4060Ti did compared to the 3060Ti, so the question is how much it improves over the 3060 on average. If that improvement is as small as it was with the Ti version (or even worse), then the 7600 would have more raw performance for a lower price, making the markup for DLSS3 and lower power draw a bit hefty in that price class imo.

Well as GN said, AMD didn't cut the price right before launch for no reason. They likely had info about the 4060 performance and decided that cutting the price would the best course of action in order for the 7600 to compete against the 4060. But regardless of which, I don't think either the 7600 or a 4060 is a good buy since you can simply get a 6700 10GB for $280. Personally I'd get RDNA 2 than either 7600/4060/4060 Ti gpus.