By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 11 May 2023
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
DonFerrari said:

The remake was to have it on PC, PS5 was more of a consequence imho, plus having the studio develop tools for PS5. Bluepoint already done a game for PS5 so instead of Bloodborne there are other IPs that would make more sense to remake, as Bloodborne is even same type of game of Demon's Souls that they already remade.

I mean that's not really the reality of why the project started.

It wasn't started by Naughty Dog, it was started by Sony's support studios, that wanted to get into remakes, and they picked a relatively new title for a smaller budget.

There are some solid rumors that Guerilla is working on a Horizon Remaster. So I don't think a Bloodborne remaster is unlikely.

Won't say you are wrong, but for me they are completely unnecessary =p



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."