By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 said:
Machiavellian said:

The CMA cannot act as the global regulator.  That gives the CMA way to much power.  As you stated, what can they stand on if the Cloud SLC no longer an issue.  It would be a huge overreach to try and then bring up something which was not part of the original decision.

They technically can and they've already said so to Microsoft that they want the concessions to apply worldwide. They will simply argue that the concessions need to be worldwide because only applying the concessions to UK won't protect competition elsewhere which in turn WILL have an effect on UK markets too.

CMA has too much power.

The best chance Microsoft has, and probably only chance, is it CAT determines that Cloud Gaming isn't its own market.

If that happens then yeah it will be hard for CMA. They're clearly set on blocking the deal though, I've no doubt that they've wanted it blocked since it was announced and just tried to find an argument to fit it.

My understanding is that once it's sent back to CMA, the Phase 2 process can begin again and a different group inside of the CMA looks at the deal, new evidence can be submitted and new demands can be issued, the new group can come to different interpretations or the same one but it won't be as long as the first time since a lot of evidence is already there.

If that was the case then all of the other regulators of the world would have just dropped the case on the spot, because now they would all just be wasting their time.
And how would that even work? How would an institution from a single country be able to enforce their will, if all the other institutions from around the globe get to a different resolution?