the-pi-guy said:
It's something like a ratio of like 2:1. If Sony is making 1 billion, then MS is making something like 500 million. If Sony is making like 2 billion, then MS is making 1 billion. This is revenue specifically. So this means Sony makes something like 1.3 billion revenue from Activision. And they probably keep something like $300 million of that, per year. MS probably makes half that, $150 million per year from CoD.
It's harder to sell subs without hardware.
They were talking about Apple there. And saying that MS is trying to follow Apple's business model. Not that MS is currently a leader in profits. |
Although I don't think it is the case it could even be that the profit margin of MS is higher than Sony for the console division or that it could be when they have more GP subs than HW.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."