By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 said:

It's baffling still how Xbox dropped the ball on remasters, they could have been easy W's and line-up fillers.

  • Fallout 1 & 2 Remastered Collection - This would gain a lot of goodwill for the classic Fallout fans, especially the weirdos who hate modern day Fallout They'd be a first time release for Xbox as well. Should release them as a double pack.
  • Remaster of Fallout 3 & New Vegas - Both large AAA remasters which should be good fillers to a line-up and maybe more importantly, fillers until the next Fallout. Released separately.
  • Remaster of Morrowind & Oblivion - Release them separately, for the love of God, stop Skyrim remasters and give the other two some love. Give a lot of Skyrim fans a chance to experience Oblivion and Morrowind and like Fallout, would be fillers until the next Elder Scrolls.
  • Banjo Threemaster - Collection of all 3 Banjo titles, Banjo fans would cream, it would be a lot of goodwill and hell maybe people give Nuts and Bolts a second chance, Lol.
  • Halo 3 Remaster - Blur cutscenes, etc. Halo 3 is ugly as sin and sticks out like a sore thumb in TMCC...TMCC is fixed now so honestly, make a Halo 3 Remaster as part of TMCC and release it as a paid add-on for TMCC, it'd be a big deal.
  • Gears 2 & 3 Remaster - Put them together as a pack and include Gears UE with it and it would also be the first time Gears 2/3 would release on PC so it should sell well on Steam. Maybe only have one multiplayer suite though, Gears 3? Marcus Fenix Collection.
  • Fable 2 & 3 Remaster - Put them together as a pack again, maybe remove the multiplayer cause it isn't really important today, it'd be nice stop-gap until Playground's Fable and stick the Fable remaster in the pack too, first time release for Fable 2 on PC as well which is the best one.

I don't understand...Do they think B/C is enough? I get why Xbox isn't making Bethesda do them but why hasn't Bethesda came to the conclusion themselves to do them, is it a matter of resources? Better to put all resources to the new games rather than remastering the old ones? Maybe...I'm sure they can find a studio available to do them though.

Remasters tend to be lower-cost and profitable, they can be released quicker, they can pad out a line-up and they can provide some easy good-will and some will release on PC for the first time ever.

Agree 100% would have def filled in some gaps in the release schedule and made a lot of people happy, and bolstered GP