By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 on 28 April 2023
Edit Thread
Zippy6 said:
Ryuu96 said:

So I don't think this would or even could apply to PS Plus? Because you'd still be playing the PlayStation version of the game and any transactions made would be via the PlayStation store where Microsoft has no way of taking 100% Nvidia, Boosteroid, Ubitus, etc, are simply using your Steam library so they aren't entitled to a cut.

We know that some publishers/titles get improved rates the 30% isn't completely universal and can be lowered for certain deals. It is possible MS said "Yes we will put it on PS5 and PS+ but we want 100% of the revenue."

But yes there isn't anyway that MS couldn't take 100% from GFN/Boosteroid as these services don't even offer game or inapp purchases.

Yeah, so it's weird to mention for GeForce Now/Boosteroid as a complaint from the CMA.

I think only the Tweeter added in PS+, I've massive doubts that Microsoft would even DARE say to Sony that they want 100% of the cut, Lmao.

In fact, it was actually revealed that Sony is taking less from Activision than the 30% standard so if Microsoft went back to offering the standard 30% cut then Sony would actually make more money from each CoD transaction than they did before, Lol.