| Azzanation said: $68.7billion is MS's money and can do what they want with it. And that's buying ABK, now they will buy someone else instead. Kotick is the reason ABK is valued at $68.7billion. They won't sack him. They have to wait for him to walk. ABK have deals with Sony (Maybe Sony said no Nintendo versions in said contracts) MS need reason to add games on rival platforms (Thank god you are not a businessmen) You can't just end deals for another without destroying the relationship. ABK are stuck with dealing with the market leader to maximize profit. Only way around that is if someone else brought them out. ABK cant do a deal with MS if they already have deals in place with Sony. Nice try though. |
Correct, never said it wasn't their money. But it's not the reason for all those not being able to be done now.
They won't sack him, but should.
ABK decide who gets the deal, not Sony, it's their decision to accept. Activision controls where their games go, not Sony, stop stretching.
MS have no reason to add games anywhere but their platforms but the buy out is no reason why their (or Activisions) can't be on NVidia, considering MS are happy for their games to be on Steam already. MS could still do a deal with NVidia to bring their games to the streaming, considering the Nvidia Now does not care where you buy the games, only that you own them already. MS already has the money from the sale of the game.
Activision accepted the deal. They can also not renew it when the terms ends or even end it early and pay Sony off with compensation if it's hindering their profitability so much. Maybe strike up a new deal with MS, seems to be what you are hinting right?
Thanks, you too.
Hmm, pie.
