TBH, I don't read reviews because my tastes don't seem to align with main stream media.
Reviews feel stale to me, and not sure multiples would be worth me reading.
Reviews can also become predictable if say the same person writes it on their own. After 100 reviews you naturally fall into a pattern of the things you talk about.
However here is an idea (and it isn't exactly a new one but rarely is it done anymore), rather then have 3 articles, why not try say three reviewers where they all discuss the game provide their final verdict on the game.
But instead of it being written in one tone like a traditional review, have say a few set questions and treat it like a panel debate and you can have all three reviewers agree, disagree and provide their input to each question or topic of discussion. In essence write it in a way that when you read it, it is like seeing three mates having a natural discussion on a topic and provide their views on it. I think this way it will cut out having redundant essays to read, when say 2 of the 3 people agree on an aspect of the game and if they write it on their own it is repeated. It also makes it less predictable what will be said in each review as the people discussing the game bounce of each other and things come to mind that you may have missed if you wrote a review on your own.
As for final verdict,
Person 1 = 8/10
Person 2 = 9/10
Person 3 = 9/10
Get the average of the three and round up to nearest 0.5 or 0. This way at least you also cut out wild ranges for multiple reviews as you are providing a combined avg consensus.
Last edited by Cobretti2 - on 27 April 2023
