drkohler said:
No it hasn't. The toll on Ukranian's army is worse than the toll on Russians, in relative numbers. Putin has enough village idiots to continue storming Bakhmuth as long as he wants. As long as he doesn't have to large-scale conscript in "main land (large "westernised" cities, in essence)" he is safe, while Ukrania is bleeding soldiers. He can easily go for 3:1 to 5:1 losses for longer than the Ukrainians can. Sure one can say "Bakhmuth is Ukrania's Fort Alamo", but this analogy only holds if the Ukranians have enough soldiers left to regroup and organise while the Russinas are held up in Bakhmuth. Whatever Russian bloke runs the attacks on Bakhmuth is the same idiot as Santa Anna was. |
Afghanistan tells us russia cannot sustain even a fraction of the loss they now suffer in Ukraine if things drags on. All indication point that russia is suffering many times more losses than Ukraine in bakmuth. This is supported by the simple fact that it is the main reasons Ukraine drags things on there instead of simply leaving the town. But if you have sources to the contrary feel free to share.
Bakmuth is not a fort Alamo either as escape route are still secured. You know the ones Russia tried many time to cut but failed everytime, cause their village idiots, are actualy the one leading russian troops and the least we can say is that they've shown this tag is well earned.
Last edited by EpicRandy - on 26 April 2023
Essay Pro