EpicRandy said:
This is taking into account that XB is the western company, FPS land, and PS is the Japanese company newly based in the west? PlayStation had a US division almost if not as soon as it existed in Japan and this was 8 years before Xbox. Along with the fact that PS, since PS4, has outsold XB 2.5 to 1, meaning third party sales would almost always be higher on PS? That is a reason that explain why Xbox does not have a stranglehold on FPS How many FPS titles has PS produced since PS4, vs XB and XB One? How many more does XB now have with Zenimax and ABK? Sony made the business decision to rely on 3rd party for FPS, MS did not make this decision for them. $120 Billion Sony is picking on $2 Trillion MS? Isn't what other users have been suggesting MS buying $70 billion ABK is being bullied? ABK statement are more akin that they consider Sony as trying to bully them out of the deal. |
PS was not headquartered in the US until 2016.
Yet MS now owns Zenimax and ABK. Everyone knows Sony complained about COD because of how much money they will lose and how that money lost, plus development and publishing profits will also be going to MS now.
So MS has way more FPS games than Sony already and also makes plenty of money from them.
Which other users? Are we talking about how Sony had argued their COD case or the merit behind it?
This statement goes along with the company values. You mean to say you think regulators won't be allowing the deal to pass due to Sony?
