Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

Captain_Yuri said:

Another shit port from Sony. You would think with a game that is as high of a profile as the last of us, they would bring their A game instead of letting Iron Galaxy handle it but instead, they cheaped out. It does use a lot of Vram as par for the course of AMD sponsored titles but it also hammers the CPU greatly and uses a lot of system ram as well over 20+GB from what I have seen.

Really though if Sony insists on putting super low effort onto their PC ports, then I'll likely won't be buying them in the future until they go into big discount mode even if my 4090 can run it.

And to think that not long ago you were praising Sony for its excellent PC ports full of PC features, only to now be faced with "another shit port from Sony". Oh, how times change... But well, if you hire the studio that made the God awful PC port of Arkham Knight, this is what can happen.

Conina said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Another shit port from Sony. You would think with a game that is as high of a profile as the last of us, they would bring their A game instead of letting Iron Galaxy handle it but instead, they cheaped out.

“For example, Microsoft might release a PlayStation version of Call of Duty where bugs and errors emerge only on the game’s final level or after later updates."

"Even if Microsoft operated in good faith, it would be incentivised to support and prioritize development of the Xbox version of the game, such as by using its best engineers and more of its resources. There would be no practical way for the CMA (or SIE) to monitor how Microsoft chooses to allocate its resources and the quality/quantity of engineers it devotes to the PlayStation version of Call of Duty, to ensure that SIE would be treated fairly and equally.”

Lol.

Sony doesn't need any outsider sabotaging their games, they're capable of doing it by themselves just fine.