shikamaru317 said:
Yeah, Nvidia pulls way too much crap with proprietary tech. A decade ago it was PhysX they were pushing in games like Borderlands 2, with it being exclusive to Nvidia GPU's. Then it was HairWorks they were pushing in games like Witcher 3, with it being exclusive to Nvidia GPU's. Now it's DLSS they are doing the exact same thing with, except they're not only preventing it from running on AMD GPU's, but now they are abandoning their previous generation cards for DLSS 3 support as well, meaning that weaker GPU's from their previous generation which would really benefit from DLSS 3, such as the 3050 and 3060, can't use it. I much prefer AMD's open source approach to things. Their TressFX competitor to Nvidia's HairWorks, open source. Their FSR competitor to DLSS, open source. It's a shame that more people don't buy AMD cards instead of feeding the Nvidia monster more money so that they can keep doing business as normal. They're never going to improve as long as they are the dominant market leader by a huge ratio. I bought Nvidia on my last 2 builds, but never again, going to get an AMD GPU next time, most likely the upcoming RX 7600 XT. |
I just hate the useless comparisons of DLSS OFF vs DLSS3 when anyone on a 30 or 40 series card would already be using DLSS2 so it should be DLSS2 v DLSS3 on the charts to show the actual gain 40 series owners can get with the update but it's the age old make your product look better by fluffing the low end to show higher gains.
Also the small print at the bottom has it stating DLSS performance mode so even bigger inflation vs DLSS Off where as in most situations you would avoid dropping it that low.
Last edited by WoodenPints - on 16 March 2023
